We noticed that you're not using the latest version of your browser. You'll still be able to use our site, but it might not work or look the way it's supposed to. We recommend upgrading your browser.
JOURNAL OF WATER MANAGEMENT MODELING JWMM
AUTHORS
REVIEWERS
ABOUT
RESOURCES
Menu SEARCH LOGIN
Software
Tap in to water management modeling that excels. PCSWMM is flexible, easy to use and streamlines your workflow – saving you time and resources.
Training
Beginner or seasoned user, our flexible training options help you understand and master the full capabilities of both EPA SWMM5 and PCSWMM.
Community
There's a whole community to support you - find solutions, view code and more.
OPEN SWMM
OPEN EPANET
Journal
Our peer-reviewed, open-access Journal of Water Management Modeling. Expand your knowledge, get insights and discover new approaches that let you work more effectively.
Conference
The International Conference on Water Management Modeling. Meet your colleagues, share your experiences and be on the forefront of advances in our profession.
Consulting
Not sure how to solve a complex water management issue? Put our experience, knowledge, and innovation to work for you.
  • AUTHORS
  • REVIEWERS
  • ABOUT
  • SEARCH
  • RESOURCES
    Software
    Training
    Community
    OPEN SWMM
    OPEN EPANET
    Journal
    Conference
    Consulting

JWMM Login

Verifying credentials  Don't have an account?
Forgot your password?

Reformatting and Post Processing Tools for SWMM5

Rajesh Rajan, Kimberly Artita, Jaclyn Marge and James (Jim) Smullen (2012)
Philadelphia Water Department; Sci-Tek Consultants Inc.; CDM Smith
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14796/JWMM.R245-19
Comments

Collapse all
Collapse all

Abstract

In its effort to meet regulatory requirements outlined in the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s (USEPA) Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Control Policy, the City of Philadelphia characterizes its combined sewer system (CSS) using the USEPA’s storm water management model (SWMM). Philadelphia’s CSS is divided into three separate drainage districts each ending at its own wastewater treatment plant. The first hydraulic models of the CSS were developed in 1994, using the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers STORM and Camp Dresser McKee’s NetSTORM. During 1995-1998, the city expanded these models in SWMM4 to include all major trunks, interceptors, and regulating structures. Due to the complexity of these models (~8 000 junctions and conduits) and resulting computational expense (model run times of 14 h to16 h), the models underwent a simplification process (~4 000 junctions and conduits) to achieve model run times on the order of 2 h to 4 h. This simplification process was performed cautiously to avoid losing any of the hydraulic characteristics of the systems. Planning level estimates included in the city’s long term control plan update (LTCPU) submitted in fall 2009 were generated using the SWMM4 simplified models. In late 2009, the city began converting its simplified SWMM4 models to SWMM5. At the time of writing (April 2011), the conversion process is 95% complete.

We note here some of the major advantages of SWMM5 over its predecessors:

- dynamic memory allocation-there are no limits on the number of model elements;

- better solution techniques-Saint-Venant equations (for dynamic waves) are solved by a successive approximation technique that results in faster convergence;

- better simulation of orifices and weirs through use of the classical orifice and weir equations instead of using equivalent pipe approximations;

- a variable time step option for simulations;

- a pipe lengthening option-helps with convergence issues in short pipes; and

- better simulation of force mains.

However, SWMM5 has some disadvantages:

- the engine has bugs (that are being addressed);

- elements like bridges have not yet been included;

- the output format makes post processing more cumbersome; and

- without care, result files can be extremely large and difficult to post-process.

As part of the SWMM4 to SWMM5 model conversion, it was necessary to update the post processing tools originally developed in SAS. SWMM4’s output format made it simple to import the data into SAS or Excel in a single datastep as a space delimited or fixed width format file. Conversely, SWMM5’s output format is stacked (i.e. the time series output for each model element is written below the previous one) and must be read in sequentially to be post processed. For smaller datasets, sequential reads are not too time consuming; but for larger datasets, sequential reads are inefficient.

In this chapter, we describe several of the post processing tools that were created or updated and modified as part of the SWMM4 to SWMM5 model conversion:

- a SWMM5 output reformatting tool;

- a hydrograph comparison tool;

- a percent capture calculation tool; and

- a calibration tool.

This paper is only available in PDF Format:

  View full text PDF

Image


Expand all

PAPER INFO

Identification

CHI ref #: R245-19 731
Volume: 20
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14796/JWMM.R245-19
Cite as: CHI JWMM 2012;R245-19

Publication History

Received: N/A
Accepted: N/A
Published: February 15, 2012

Status

# reviewers: 2
Version: Final published

Copyright

© 2012 CHI. Some rights reserved.

License

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The Journal of Water Management Modeling is an open-access (OA) publication. Open access means that articles and papers are available without barriers to all who could benefit from them. Practically speaking, all published works will be available to a worldwide audience, free, immediately on publication. As such, JWMM can be considered a Diamond, Gratis OA journal.

All papers published in the JWMM are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY).

JWMM content can be downloaded, printed, copied, distributed, and linked-to, when providing full attribution to both the author/s and JWMM.


AUTHORS

Rajesh Rajan

Philadelphia Water Department, Philadelphia, PA, USA
ORCiD:

Kimberly Artita

Sci-Tek Consultants Inc., Philadelphia, PA, USA
ORCiD:

Jaclyn Marge

Philadelphia Water Department, Philadelphia, PA, USA
ORCiD:

James (Jim) Smullen

CDM Smith, Edison, NJ, USA
ORCiD:


ADDITIONAL DATA

 

COMMENTS

Be the first to comment.

RELATED PAPERS

 


TAGS

 

Connect With Us

Journal of Water Management Modeling
ISSN: 2292-6062

  info@chijournal.org

147 Wyndham St. N., Ste. 202
Guelph, Ontario, Canada, N1H 4E9
About JWMM

Mission and intent

Editorial board

Review process

Disclaimer

Privacy policy

For Authors

Submit paper

Author checklist

Journal paper template

Reference guide

Unit conversion table

For Reviewers

Reviewing guidelines

Criteria to be used

Standards of acceptance


Copyright 2023 by CHI