We noticed that you're not using the latest version of your browser. You'll still be able to use our site, but it might not work or look the way it's supposed to. We recommend upgrading your browser.
JOURNAL OF WATER MANAGEMENT MODELING JWMM
AUTHORS
REVIEWERS
ABOUT
RESOURCES
Menu SEARCH LOGIN
Software
Tap in to water management modeling that excels. PCSWMM is flexible, easy to use and streamlines your workflow – saving you time and resources.
Training
Beginner or seasoned user, our flexible training options help you understand and master the full capabilities of both EPA SWMM5 and PCSWMM.
Community
There's a whole community to support you - find solutions, view code and more.
OPEN SWMM
OPEN EPANET
Journal
Our peer-reviewed, open-access Journal of Water Management Modeling. Expand your knowledge, get insights and discover new approaches that let you work more effectively.
Conference
The International Conference on Water Management Modeling. Meet your colleagues, share your experiences and be on the forefront of advances in our profession.
Consulting
Not sure how to solve a complex water management issue? Put our experience, knowledge, and innovation to work for you.
  • AUTHORS
  • REVIEWERS
  • ABOUT
  • SEARCH
  • RESOURCES
    Software
    Training
    Community
    OPEN SWMM
    OPEN EPANET
    Journal
    Conference
    Consulting

JWMM Login

Verifying credentials  Don't have an account?
Forgot your password?

Determining a Consistent Peak Flow Level of Control for a Wet Weather Management Plan

Hazem Gheith, Matthew Davis, Tim Fallara and Taymour El-Hosseiny (2008)
Brown and Caldwell; City of Columbus; EMH&T Inc.
https://doi.org/10.14796/JWMM.R228-23
Comments

Collapse all
Collapse all

Abstract

The City of Columbus, Ohio, completed a comprehensive Wet Weather Management Plan (WWMP) to mitigate hydraulic deficiencies in the City’s main trunk sewers and to address sanitary sewer overflow (SSO) into waterways and water-in-basements occurrence (WIBs). One of the main problems we overcame was to determine the desired level of service (LOS), or what is more commonly called the most reasonable level of control (LOC). The concept, restated, answers the question, “With what frequency should deficiency (problem, emergency) thresholds be reached?” That is, how often (on average) should SSOs and WIBs occur?

At the outset of Columbus’ WWMP production, the design team was well aware of the high sensitivity of the model to hydraulic and hydrologic parameters such as storm recurrence intervals and durations, antecedent moisture conditions, and rainfall distributions. Federal guidelines do not mandate specifics on these. And the impact these would have had on the program costs made determining a reasonable LOC one of the most important questions we faced. To minimize the impact of these sensitivities, and to ensure that all of the City of Columbus’ main trunk sewers meet or exceed the LOC, the design team used peak-flow events or a maximum peak flow rate LOS rather than the more traditional design storm LOS method. The focus of this chapter is to describe this procedure, and the many innovative steps we used to generate this consistent peak-flow LOS in the main trunks of Columbus’ large wastewater collection system (approximately 3000 mi. (4824 km) of separate and combined sewer pipe).

The proposed procedure specifically provides an alternative to the traditional application of one system-wide design storm, where the storm recurrence interval is assumed to be the LOS. That is, this is an alternative to devising and sizing remediation actions using a specific design storm, like the 10-y recurrence interval storm, which implies, by the storm’s probability of recurrence, that it would provide a 10-y LOC. In our procedure, we are devising and sizing remediation actions to control the maximum HGL in main trunk sewers up to specified recurring peak flow rates.

The proposed procedure first evaluated flow meter records to determine the peak flow rates at desired recurrence intervals (e.g. 2 y, 5 y, and 10 y peak flow levels – to facilitate a knee-of-the-curve analysis) for each main trunk sewer, using traditional statistical analysis techniques, and making use of the City of Columbus’ long record of flow metering. The identified flows at each desired LOC were then used iteratively in Columbus' existing SWMM model to determine the appropriate synthetic (design) storms generating the desired peak flow rates in each main trunk sewer. Innovative procedures to augment flow anomalies in measured flow data such as meter data loss, flow backups, overflows, and capacity limitations were also devised. After defining the correct design storms required to generate the peak flow associated with each LOC for each main trunk sewer, the collection system model was updated to reflect the desired end-of-program year tributary conditions. The main trunk sewers models were then put together into a system-wide collection system model in order to evaluate the complex system-wide operation strategy and the nature of the system-wide alternative solution.

During the alternative analysis, several approaches were considered in addressing the system’s hydraulic deficiencies, including express sewers, relief pipes, local storage facilities, and large storage and conveyance tunnels. The recommended system-wide solution for the City of Columbus’s collection system was a combination of augmentation relief pipes and two long deep tunnels (in-line storage) which cross and relieve several main trunk sewers.

The developed procedure is a straightforward approach that can easily be adopted for use in other large and complex collection systems similar to the one found in Columbus, Ohio.

This paper is only available in PDF Format:

  View full text PDF

Image


Expand all

PAPER INFO

Identification

CHI ref #: R228-23 831
Volume: 16
Cite as: CHI JWMM 2008;R228-23
https://doi.org/10.14796/JWMM.R228-23

Publication History

Received: N/A
Accepted: N/A
Published: February 15, 2008

Status

# reviewers: 2
Version: Final published

Copyright

© 2008 CHI. Some rights reserved.

The Journal of Water Management Modeling is an open-access (OA) publication. Open access means that articles and papers are available without barriers to all who could benefit from them. Practically speaking, all published works will be available to a worldwide audience, free, immediately on publication. As such, JWMM can be considered a Diamond, Gratis OA journal.

Paper and publication copyrights are summarized here. JWMM content can be downloaded, printed, copied, distributed, and linked-to when providing full attribution to both the author/s and JWMM.


AUTHORS

Hazem Gheith

Brown and Caldwell, Columbus, OH, USA

Matthew Davis

Brown and Caldwell, Andover, MA, USA

Tim Fallara

City of Columbus, Columbus, OH, USA

Taymour El-Hosseiny

EMH&T Inc., Columbus, OH, USA

ADDITIONAL DATA

 

COMMENTS

Be the first to comment.

RELATED PAPERS

 


TAGS

 

Connect With Us

Journal of Water Management Modeling
ISSN: 2292-6062

  info@chijournal.org

147 Wyndham St. N., Ste. 202
Guelph, Ontario, Canada, N1H 4E9
About JWMM

Mission and intent

Editorial board

Review process

Disclaimer

Privacy policy

For Authors

Submit paper

Author checklist

Journal paper template

Reference guide

Transfer of copyright

Unit conversion table

For Reviewers

Reviewing guidelines

Criteria to be used

Standards of acceptance


Copyright 2022 by CHI