We noticed that you're not using the latest version of your browser. You'll still be able to use our site, but it might not work or look the way it's supposed to. We recommend upgrading your browser.
JOURNAL OF WATER MANAGEMENT MODELING JWMM
AUTHORS
REVIEWERS
ABOUT
RESOURCES
Menu SEARCH LOGIN
Software
Tap in to water management modeling that excels. PCSWMM is flexible, easy to use and streamlines your workflow – saving you time and resources.
Training
Beginner or seasoned user, our flexible training options help you understand and master the full capabilities of both EPA SWMM5 and PCSWMM.
Community
There's a whole community to support you - find solutions, view code and more.
OPEN SWMM
OPEN EPANET
Journal
Our peer-reviewed, open-access Journal of Water Management Modeling. Expand your knowledge, get insights and discover new approaches that let you work more effectively.
Conference
The International Conference on Water Management Modeling. Meet your colleagues, share your experiences and be on the forefront of advances in our profession.
Consulting
Not sure how to solve a complex water management issue? Put our experience, knowledge, and innovation to work for you.
  • AUTHORS
  • REVIEWERS
  • ABOUT
  • SEARCH
  • RESOURCES
    Software
    Training
    Community
    OPEN SWMM
    OPEN EPANET
    Journal
    Conference
    Consulting

JWMM Login

Verifying credentials  Don't have an account?
Forgot your password?

Reliability of Design Storms used to Size Urban Stormwater System Elements

Umar Malik and William James (2007)
Stantec Consulting; University of Guelph
https://doi.org/10.14796/JWMM.R227-16
Comments

Collapse all
Collapse all

Abstract

The objective of this study was to generate hydrographs using design storms and real rain data recorded over a 30 y time period. In the first step rainfall characteristics were investigated using Intensity-Duration-Frequency (IDF) relationships. IDF curves were developed, called UM IDF curves, and when compared to the official Hamilton IDF curves showed a striking similarity for events with low return periods, and some variation for 50 and 100 y return periods. From the UM IDF curves three new design storms (SCS type 2, AES Canadian and Chicago Storm), referred to as UM Design Storms, were developed for comparison with the Hamilton design storms. The differences in intensity-duration of the less frequent storms (observed in the IDF comparison) were also reflected in the design storm volume and peak discharge. All the different design distributions, for a wide range of return periods, were entered into the rainfall-runoff model, PCSWMM, for event simulation of design storms. PCSWMM was also run for continuous simulation of the coarse observed data. Keeping the geomorphic conditions and loss parameters constant, differences were quantified in terms of computed flow and storage capacities for two design applications. The designs derived from the coarse observed data were considered to be optimal and used to decide suitability or otherwise of the designs based on other synthetic distribution patterns, and it was found that almost all the application designs obtained from design storm hyetographs were over-designed. In other words, for every return period, the flow capacity and detention storage required to accommodate the design storm hydrographs was greater than what would be required if the same applications were designed for historic storms in continuous simulation. Given the coarse continuous data these results are to be expected, and should be reexamined when continuous at a fine time step become available.

Evidently design storms generate a hydrograph with greater volume and a higher peak, requiring more detention storage, greater flow capacity and larger pipe sizes, than using coarse continuous simulation. It is still not yet clear whether structures based on design storms are over-sized and costlier than necessary.

The study showed that SCS type 2 and the AES Canadian design storms yield flow and storage capacities relatively closer to the coarse continuous data while the Chicago design storms produce over-sized flow and storage capacities. The latter may be deemed to not provide representative rainfall distributions for Southern Ontario.

This paper is only available in PDF Format:

  View full text PDF

Image


Expand all

PAPER INFO

Identification

CHI ref #: R227-16 849
Volume: 15
Cite as: CHI JWMM 2007;R227-16
https://doi.org/10.14796/JWMM.R227-16

Publication History

Received: N/A
Accepted: N/A
Published: February 15, 2007

Status

# reviewers: 2
Version: Final published

Copyright

© 2007 CHI. Some rights reserved.

The Journal of Water Management Modeling is an open-access (OA) publication. Open access means that articles and papers are available without barriers to all who could benefit from them. Practically speaking, all published works will be available to a worldwide audience, free, immediately on publication. As such, JWMM can be considered a Diamond, Gratis OA journal.

Paper and publication copyrights are summarized here. JWMM content can be downloaded, printed, copied, distributed, and linked-to when providing full attribution to both the author/s and JWMM.


AUTHORS

Umar Malik

Stantec Consulting, Markham, ON, Canada

William James

University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada

ADDITIONAL DATA

 

COMMENTS

Be the first to comment.

RELATED PAPERS

 


TAGS

 

Connect With Us

Journal of Water Management Modeling
ISSN: 2292-6062

  info@chijournal.org

147 Wyndham St. N., Ste. 202
Guelph, Ontario, Canada, N1H 4E9
About JWMM

Mission and intent

Editorial board

Review process

Disclaimer

Privacy policy

For Authors

Submit paper

Author checklist

Journal paper template

Reference guide

Transfer of copyright

Unit conversion table

For Reviewers

Reviewing guidelines

Criteria to be used

Standards of acceptance


Copyright 2022 by CHI