We noticed that you're not using the latest version of your browser. You'll still be able to use our site, but it might not work or look the way it's supposed to. We recommend upgrading your browser.
JOURNAL OF WATER MANAGEMENT MODELING JWMM
AUTHORS
REVIEWERS
ABOUT
RESOURCES
Menu SEARCH LOGIN
Software
Tap in to water management modeling that excels. PCSWMM is flexible, easy to use and streamlines your workflow – saving you time and resources.
Training
Beginner or seasoned user, our flexible training options help you understand and master the full capabilities of both EPA SWMM5 and PCSWMM.
Community
There's a whole community to support you - find solutions, view code and more.
OPEN SWMM
OPEN EPANET
Journal
Our peer-reviewed, open-access Journal of Water Management Modeling. Expand your knowledge, get insights and discover new approaches that let you work more effectively.
Conference
The International Conference on Water Management Modeling. Meet your colleagues, share your experiences and be on the forefront of advances in our profession.
Consulting
Not sure how to solve a complex water management issue? Put our experience, knowledge, and innovation to work for you.
  • AUTHORS
  • REVIEWERS
  • ABOUT
  • SEARCH
  • RESOURCES
    Software
    Training
    Community
    OPEN SWMM
    OPEN EPANET
    Journal
    Conference
    Consulting

JWMM Login

Verifying credentials  Don't have an account?
Forgot your password?

Short Time-Interval Rainfall Disaggregation for Continuous Hydrologic Simulation

Steven Burian and S. Rocky Durrans (2002)
University of Arkansas; University of Alabama
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14796/JWMM.R208-04
Comments

Collapse all
Collapse all

Abstract

Traditionally design storms have been used to design and analyze urban drainage systems and hydraulic structures. Design storms can be developed with the desired temporal resolution to accommodate urban hydrology needs, but because the temporal distribution is generally arbitrary the application of complex disaggregation techniques is unwarranted. Continuous hydrologic simulation is recommended as an alternative to the traditional design storm approach for the design and analysis of hydrologic and hydraulic structures for reasons discussed in James (1994) and James and Robinson (1982). Continuous simulation models require long-term rainfall records (preferably more than 50 years) to generate the long-term statistical response of the hydrologic system required for accurate design and analysis of engineering systems and the evaluation of ecological and sustainability issues.

Accurate hydrologic simulation of small urban catchments requires the use of a rainfall time series with a fine temporal resolution. Studies have shown that when the response time of a watershed is shorter than the total duration of rainfall excess, the runoff rate is observed to depend on the depth of rainfall and the intensity distribution (Ball 1994; Woolhiser and Goodrich 1988; Hjelmfelt 1981). But for fully developed hydrographs Ball (1994) found the temporal pattern of rainfall excess to have little influence over the peak discharge. Thus, for short duration storms coarse time resolution rainfall data may smooth the high rainfall intensities (especially those observed during convective storms), and runoff could be underestimated. Hernandez and Nachabe (2000) demonstrated that when Hortonian runoff is dominant, infiltration and runoff are very sensitive to time resolution. They observed finer temporal resolution rainfall to produce more runoff than coarser rainfall. In general, hydraulic analysis of drainage systems requires rainfall data in 5- to 15-minute increments to produce hydrographs that accurately predict peak flows (Nix 1994).

The procurement and management of long-term rainfall records is no longer a problem for locations where records are available electronically. Today, the primary difficulties with long-term rainfall records are (1) unavailability at the desired location or (2) not being recorded at the desired temporal resolution. One solution to these problems would be to employ a synthetic rainfall generator to produce long-term rainfall fields with the desired spatial and temporal resolution. A second solution for circumstance (2) (i.e., when a long-term rainfall record exists but has too coarse temporal resolution) is to employ a temporal disaggregation technique to disaggregate the record into a finer temporal resolution. The issue then becomes the selection and application of an appropriate disaggregation method to produce a long-term rainfall record at the desired temporal resolution.

This chapter compares several temporal rainfall disaggregation techniques applicable to continuous hydrologic simulation. The focus is the disaggregation of hourly rainfall records into sub-hourly increments because in North America hourly rain gauges are relatively common and the records often have sufficient lengths for use in long-term continuous simulation. The rainfall disaggregation methods included in the study were selected based on the needs of hydrologic modelers. In general, hydrologic modelers desire techniques that are conceptually intuitive, easily grasped, and sufficiently flexible that they could be applied to any locality and for any desired level of disaggregation (so they could be relatively easily standardized). Based on these criteria, the five methods selected for comparison were the uniform distribution approach (described below), the quadratic spline and quadratic interpolating polynomial approaches (described by Durrans et al. (1999)), the geometric similarity approach (the continuous-deterministic disaggregation model described by Ormsbee (1989)), and the backpropagation ANN approach (described by Burian et al. (2000)). Methods that require the estimation of numerous parameters were not included in this study. The relative performance of the five techniques for disaggregating hourly rainfall records from Alabama into 15-minute increments is reviewed below. Additional evaluation of the uniform distribution, the geometric similarity, and the ANN techniques is reported for 5-minute and 15-minute rainfall in Arkansas.

This paper is only available in PDF Format:

  View full text PDF

Image


Expand all

PAPER INFO

Identification

CHI ref #: R208-04 968
Volume: 10
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14796/JWMM.R208-04
Cite as: CHI JWMM 2002;R208-04

Publication History

Received: N/A
Accepted: N/A
Published: February 15, 2002

Status

# reviewers: 2
Version: Final published

Copyright

© 2002 CHI. Some rights reserved.

License

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The Journal of Water Management Modeling is an open-access (OA) publication. Open access means that articles and papers are available without barriers to all who could benefit from them. Practically speaking, all published works will be available to a worldwide audience, free, immediately on publication. As such, JWMM can be considered a Diamond, Gratis OA journal.

All papers published in the JWMM are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY).

JWMM content can be downloaded, printed, copied, distributed, and linked-to, when providing full attribution to both the author/s and JWMM.


AUTHORS

Steven Burian

University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA
ORCiD:

S. Rocky Durrans

University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA
ORCiD:


ADDITIONAL DATA

 

COMMENTS

Be the first to comment.

RELATED PAPERS

 


TAGS

 

Connect With Us

Journal of Water Management Modeling
ISSN: 2292-6062

  info@chijournal.org

147 Wyndham St. N., Ste. 202
Guelph, Ontario, Canada, N1H 4E9
About JWMM

Mission and intent

Editorial board

Review process

Disclaimer

Privacy policy

For Authors

Submit paper

Author checklist

Journal paper template

Reference guide

Unit conversion table

For Reviewers

Reviewing guidelines

Criteria to be used

Standards of acceptance


Copyright 2023 by CHI