We noticed that you're not using the latest version of your browser. You'll still be able to use our site, but it might not work or look the way it's supposed to. We recommend upgrading your browser.
JOURNAL OF WATER MANAGEMENT MODELING JWMM
AUTHORS
REVIEWERS
ABOUT
RESOURCES
Menu SEARCH LOGIN
Software
Tap in to water management modeling that excels. PCSWMM is flexible, easy to use and streamlines your workflow – saving you time and resources.
Training
Beginner or seasoned user, our flexible training options help you understand and master the full capabilities of both EPA SWMM5 and PCSWMM.
Community
There's a whole community to support you - find solutions, view code and more.
OPEN SWMM
OPEN EPANET
Journal
Our peer-reviewed, open-access Journal of Water Management Modeling. Expand your knowledge, get insights and discover new approaches that let you work more effectively.
Conference
The International Conference on Water Management Modeling. Meet your colleagues, share your experiences and be on the forefront of advances in our profession.
Consulting
Not sure how to solve a complex water management issue? Put our experience, knowledge, and innovation to work for you.
  • AUTHORS
  • REVIEWERS
  • ABOUT
  • SEARCH
  • RESOURCES
    Software
    Training
    Community
    OPEN SWMM
    OPEN EPANET
    Journal
    Conference
    Consulting

JWMM Login

Verifying credentials  Don't have an account?
Forgot your password?

Unique Features of the Source Loading and Management Model (SLAMM)

Robert E. Pitt (1998)
University of Alabama
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14796/JWMM.R200-02
Comments

Collapse all
Collapse all

Abstract

A logical approach to stormwater management requires knowledge of the problems that are to be solved, the sources of the problem pollutants, and the effectiveness of stormwater management practices that can control the problem pollutants at their sources and at outfalls. SLAMM is designed to provide information on these last two aspects of this approach. SLAMM can be an important component, along with local receiving water studies, of an effective watershed management program.

SLAMM was initially developed to evaluate stormwater control practices more efficiently. It soon became evident that in order to accurately evaluate the effectiveness of stormwater controls at an outfall, the sources of the pollutants or problem water flows must be known. SLAMM has evolved to include a variety of source area and end-of-pipe controls and the ability to predict the concentra-tions and loadings of many different pollutants from a large number of potential source areas. SLAMM calculates mass balances for both particulate and dis-solved pollutants and runoff flow volumes for different development character-istics and rainfalls. It was designed to give relatively simple answers (pollutant mass discharges and control measure effects for a very large variety of potential conditions). Basic types of control practices evaluated by SLAMM include detention ponds, percolation ponds, infiltration devices, porous pavements, grass swales, catchbasin cleaning, and street cleaning, plus different development alternatives. Most of these controls can be evaluated in many combinations and at many source areas as well as the outfall location. SLAMM also predicts the relative contributions of different source areas (roofs, streets, parking areas, landscaped areas, undeveloped areas, etc.) for each land use investigated. An early version of SLAMM was described by Pitt and Shawley (1982) as part of the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program study conducted in Castro Valley, CA. A detailed description of SLAMM, including examples of its use, was presented by Pitt and Voorhees (1995).

The development of SLAMM began in the mid 1970s, primarily as a data reduction tool for use in early street cleaning and pollutant source identification projects sponsored by the EPA's Storm and Combined Sewer Pollution Control Program (Pitt 1979; Pitt and Bozeman 1982; Pitt 1984). Much of the information contained in SLAMM was obtained during the EPA's Nationwide Urban Runoff Program (NURP) (EPA 1983), especially the early Alameda County, California (Pitt and Shawley 1982), and the Bellevue, Washington (Pitt and Bissonnette 1984) projects. The completion of the model was made possible by the remainder of the NURP projects and additional field studies and programming support sponsored by the Ontario Ministry of the Environment (Pitt and McLean 1986), the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WI DNR) (Pitt 1986), and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (Pitt and Voorhees 1995).

SLAMM has been commonly used as a planning level model for large watershed projects. As an example, SLAMM has been extensively used by the Wisconsin Nonpoint Source Program in its evaluation of urban areas, as described by Pitt (1986). The WI DNR uses SLAMM to identify sources of pollutants, quantify their discharges, and to evaluate alternative control practices. Its use in Wisconsin in conjunction with geographical information systems (GIS) has also been described by several authors (Thum, et al. 1990; Ventura and Kim 1993; Kim and Ventura 1993; Kim, et al. 1993; and Haubner and Joeres 1996). Another early use of SLAMM on a watershed scale was during the Toronto Area Watershed Management Strategy program (TAWMS). In this project, SLAMM was used to predict drainage area pollutant and flow discharges, SWMM was used to predict combined sewer overflow (CSO) discharges from the older sections of the city, and HSPF was used to evaluate receiving water conditions resulting from these discharges (TAWMS 1986).

SLAMM is used to better understand the relationships between sources of urban runoff pollutants and runoff quality. It has been continually expanded since the late 1970s and now includes a wide variety of source area and outfall control practices. SLAMM is strongly based on field observations, with minimal reliance on theoretical processes that have not been adequately documented or confirmed in the field. Special emphasis has been placed on small storm hydrology and particulate washoff in SLAMM. Many currently available urban runoff models have their roots in drainage design where the emphasis is on very large and rare rains. In contrast, many stormwater quality problems are mostly associated with common and relatively small rains. The assumptions and simplifications that are legitimately used with drainage design models are not appropriate for water quality models. SLAMM therefore incorporates unique process descriptions to more accurately predict the sources of runoff pollutants and flows for the storms of most interest in stormwater quality analysis

This paper is only available in PDF Format:

  View full text PDF

Image


Expand all

PAPER INFO

Identification

CHI ref #: R200-02 1055
Volume: 6
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14796/JWMM.R200-02
Cite as: CHI JWMM 1998;R200-02

Publication History

Received: N/A
Accepted: N/A
Published: February 15, 1998

Status

# reviewers: 2
Version: Final published

Copyright

© 1998 CHI. Some rights reserved.

License

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The Journal of Water Management Modeling is an open-access (OA) publication. Open access means that articles and papers are available without barriers to all who could benefit from them. Practically speaking, all published works will be available to a worldwide audience, free, immediately on publication. As such, JWMM can be considered a Diamond, Gratis OA journal.

All papers published in the JWMM are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY).

JWMM content can be downloaded, printed, copied, distributed, and linked-to, when providing full attribution to both the author/s and JWMM.


AUTHORS

Robert E. Pitt

University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA
ORCiD:


ADDITIONAL DATA

 

COMMENTS

Be the first to comment.

RELATED PAPERS

 


TAGS

 

Connect With Us

Journal of Water Management Modeling
ISSN: 2292-6062

  info@chijournal.org

147 Wyndham St. N., Ste. 202
Guelph, Ontario, Canada, N1H 4E9
About JWMM

Mission and intent

Editorial board

Review process

Disclaimer

Privacy policy

For Authors

Submit paper

Author checklist

Journal paper template

Reference guide

Transfer of copyright

Unit conversion table

For Reviewers

Reviewing guidelines

Criteria to be used

Standards of acceptance


Copyright 2022 by CHI