We noticed that you're not using the latest version of your browser. You'll still be able to use our site, but it might not work or look the way it's supposed to. We recommend upgrading your browser.
JWMM
ABOUT
PAPERS
AUTHORS
REVIEWERS
RESOURCES
Menu LOGIN
Software
Tap in to water management modeling that excels. PCSWMM is flexible, easy to use and streamlines your workflow – saving you time and resources.
Training
Beginner or seasoned user, our flexible training options help you understand and master the full capabilities of both EPA SWMM5 and PCSWMM.
Community
There's a whole community to support you - find solutions, view code and more.
OPEN SWMM
OPEN EPANET
Journal
Our peer-reviewed, open-access Journal of Water Management Modeling. Expand your knowledge, get insights and discover new approaches that let you work more effectively.
Conference
The International Conference on Water Management Modeling. Meet your colleagues, share your experiences and be on the forefront of advances in our profession.
Consulting
Not sure how to solve a complex water management issue? Put our experience, knowledge, and innovation to work for you.
  • PAPERS
  • AUTHORS
  • REVIEWERS
  • ABOUT
  • SEARCH
  • RESOURCES
    Software
    Training
    Community
    OPEN SWMM
    OPEN EPANET
    Journal
    Conference
    Consulting

JWMM Login

Verifying credentials wait Don't have an account?
Forgot your password?

Buffalo River Floatables Control and Continuous Water Quality Monitoring Demonstration Project

Kim Irvine (2002)
Buffalo State College - SUNY, USA
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14796/JWMM.R208-10
comment Discussion

Collapse all
Collapse all

Abstract

A floatables trap was installed at the mouth of a combined sewer outfall in the Buffalo River, NY, to evaluate the utility of this technology in reducing floatables dispersal. In addition to the floatables trap, two Hydrolab Datasondes were installed to demonstrate the importance of a continuous monitoring system in evaluating impacts of combined sewer overflows (CSOs) on receiving water body quality. One Hydrolab was hung in the river from the floatables trap near the mouth of the outfall and one was attached to an upstream bridge abutment, to represent ambient river conditions. Monitored parameters included dissolved oxygen, pH, conductivity, temperature, and redox.

Floatables were collected successfully over an eight week period that included both dry weather and three CSO events. The dry weather floatables were collected and analyzed as representative of fugitive inputs from the river that were not related to CSO activity. The floatables were sorted into nine categories and the number, mass, and volume in each category were determined. Mean floatables accumulation rates in the trap were significantly greater for CSO periods than dry weather periods. The distribution of floatables, by category, in the sampled CSOs was compared to the distribution for two sewersheds from a study conducted in Newark, New Jersey. The distributions for the two New Jersey sewersheds were similar to each other, but the floatables in Buffalo consisted of more wood and less plastic. The average mass of floatables trapped per 1,000 cubic feet (28.3 m3) of CSO discharge was considerably less for the Buffalo sewershed than the averages for the two New Jersey sewersheds. Low floatables discharge from the Buffalo sewershed, in part, may be due to sewer hoods.

In general, the results for parameters measured with the Hydrolabs were similar to past spot sampling done on the river. Of greatest interest were the results for dissolved oxygen. Classically described dissolved oxygen sags were not observed in the river at the mouth of the outfall during CSO events. In fact, the greatest decreases in dissolved oxygen levels (at both sites) were observed in association with navigational dredging activities, likely due to sediment oxygen demand when sediment was resuspended.

This paper is only available in PDF Format:

  View full text PDF

Image


ABOUT THIS PAPER
CITED BY
n/a
VIEWS
1228

PAPER INFO

Identification

CHI ref #: R208-10 974
Volume: 10
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14796/JWMM.R208-10
Cite as: JWMM 10: R208-10

Publication History

Received: N/A
1st decision: N/A
Accepted: N/A
Published: February 15, 2002

Status

Reviewers: 2
Version: Final published

Copyright

© 2002 CHI.
Some rights reserved.

License

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The Journal of Water Management Modeling is an open-access (OA) publication. Open access means that articles and papers are available without barriers to all who could benefit from them. Practically speaking, all published works will be available to a worldwide audience, free, immediately on publication. As such, JWMM can be considered a Diamond, Gratis OA journal.

All papers published in the JWMM are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY).

JWMM content can be downloaded, printed, copied, distributed, and linked-to, when providing full attribution to both the author/s and JWMM.


AUTHORS

Kim Irvine

Buffalo State College - SUNY, Buffalo, NY, USA
ORCiD: 0000-0003-2985-6737

ADDITIONAL DATA

 wait

DISCUSSION

Be the first to comment.

RELATED PAPERS

 wait


TAGS

 wait

Connect With Us

Journal of Water Management Modeling (JWMM)
ISSN: 2292-6062

  info@chijournal.org

147 Wyndham St. N., Ste. 202
Guelph, Ontario, Canada, N1H 4E9
About JWMM

Mission and intent

Editorial board

Review process

Disclaimer

Privacy policy

For Authors

Guide for authors

Submit your paper

Author checklist

JWMM paper template

Reference guide

Unit conversion table

For Reviewers

Guide for reviewers

Reviewing guidelines

Criteria to be used

Standards of acceptance


Copyright 2026 by CHI